top of page
Search

Why 1+1 > 2: Rethinking Tutoring Sessions, Attention Span, and Beyond

When it comes to tutoring, many parents and students assume that longer sessions mean more progress. After all, two hours should equal twice the learning of one, right? But learning doesn’t always work that way. In fact, when it comes to focus, memory, and true understanding, more time does not always mean better results.



The Attention Curve: Why We Lose Focus



Learning, especially in subjects like math or reading comprehension, takes a lot of mental energy. Imagine solving a series of SAT math problems. Your brain is constantly firing up, switching between analytical thinking, problem-solving strategies, and mental calculations. Just like a muscle, the brain can overheat. After about 50 to 60 minutes of intense cognitive work, focus drops, mistakes increase, and learning efficiency goes down.


It’s the same when brainstorming writing materials, where creativity is required and concentration needs to stay sharp. Without a pause to recharge, your brain begins to wander, making the extra hour far less productive than expected.



The Science Behind the Scene



Research on attention span and cognitive load suggests that our brain has natural limits when processing new information. A study published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2014) shows that mental fatigue builds steadily over time, decreasing accuracy and problem-solving ability in as little as one hour of high-effort cognitive work.


You can see this reflected in the well-known “forgetting curve,” first studied by psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus in 1885 and still validated today. This curve shows how quickly we lose information if it’s not reviewed under the right conditions. Simply extending session time doesn’t stop forgetting—it often makes the experience more exhausting, reducing long-term retention.



When 1+1 > 2



We often find that two 1-hour sessions deliver more than one 2-hour session. Shorter lessons make it easier to stay engaged, absorb information, and review it meaningfully later. They leave room for proper breaks, reducing frustration and mental overload.


This is especially true for younger learners or students working in foreign languages, where every new word or formula adds extra cognitive load. It’s much better to learn a smaller set of ideas, let the brain rest, and return ready to absorb more the next day.



What If Two Hours Are Necessary?



Sometimes schedules don’t allow for two separate sessions. When that’s the case, we maximize learning during a long session by carefully adjusting structure.


  • In the first half, the session is student-led, with learners actively solving problems, brainstorming ideas, and asking questions.

  • In the second half, it becomes instructor-led, where the tutor takes over to demonstrate approaches, guide reflection, and keep energy up.

  • For students who struggle to absorb and retain information in the second hour, we alternate between student-led and instructor-led activities to build tolerance for mental stretch over time.



We also use tools like our Think Out Loud Exercise to help students stay engaged, communicate uncertainty, and self-diagnose confusion, making the most of every minute.



How We Apply This at Futures Academy



Every student is different, and we listen closely to what they need. If attention dips after an hour, we adapt. Sometimes that means shifting to two shorter sessions, adjusting the pace, and creating natural breaks for the brain to reset.


By combining this with strategies like spaced repetition, we help students not only learn more in the moment but keep that knowledge weeks and months later. The result is less wasted time, less frustration, and a steadier climb toward mastery.


At Futures Academy, learning isn’t about counting hours. It’s about making each minute count—and just as importantly, it’s about understanding your own learning style and feeling comfortable being vocal about your needs, so we can meet you where you are and help you thrive.





References



  • Boksem, M. A. S., Meijman, T. F., & Lorist, M. M. (2006). Mental fatigue, motivation and action monitoring. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00008

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. Original text

  • BBC Future. (2014). How to learn more efficiently. Article link


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page